Archive for fellowship – Page 11

Summer Reflections 2010 – Post #9

John Hughes just graduated from SIPA and during his second year of study worked in our office.  He is spending the better part of the summer in the office to assist with projects and help fill in for a staff member on maternity leave.  John is set up for a job in Washington, D.C. and will be moving there in August (our second largest alumni network in the world is in D.C if you were interested).

I asked John to reflect a bit on his experience as a SIPA student and contribute to the blog over the summer.  This is entry #9.

__________________________

I thought I’d write a post on my experience with the Fellowship process at SIPA, since it is the reason why I am at the Admissions office now and the topic of fellowships is something that most incoming and prospective students are very interested in.

The Fellowship process at SIPA is fairly straightforward.  The majority of fellowship money is reserved for second-year students, meaning that only a small fraction (about 10%) of first-year students receive one.  These first-year fellowships are merit-based and come with no strings attached.  So, if you are lucky enough to get one you should be proud.  Second-year fellowships, however, do come with strings attached and are based on a combination of merit and need.

Early in the second semester of your first year SIPA will hold a fellowship information session for all first-year students.  In this the administration will explain the types of fellowships available and what one needs to be eligible.  In a nutshell, any student who scores above a 3.2 in his/her first semester AND has a demonstrable need is eligible.  The demonstrable need amount does not appear to be too narrowly defined, and just because somebody is borrowing the entire cost of attendance does not make him/her more eligible than somebody who is only borrowing $20,000 a year.  Thus, if you are borrowing any money at all and get above a 3.2 I believe you would be considered eligible.

Once you are deemed to be eligible you are given the opportunity to apply for 3 fellowships that interest you.  These fellowships fall into three basic categories:  First, there are Teaching Assistant (TA) positions in which second-year students are selected to lead optional help classes for all the first year core courses.  There are also TA positions for classes that fall outside of the core, but are still quantitative in nature, such as corporate finance.  To get one of these fellowships a student must have done very well in that class.

The second type of fellowship is a Program Assistant (PA).  These fellowships are administrative in nature, and are usually in one of the SIPA offices like Career Services, Admissions, Student Affairs etc.  There are also PA positions monitoring the computer labs.

A third type of Fellowship is the Department Program Assistant (DPA), which is like a PA but places students in academic offices rather than administrative offices.  For example, a student could work as the DPA in the Harriman Institute or for the International Security Policy concentration.  In addition to these three main types, there are also fellowships given to tutor first-year students who need help with econ or other difficult classes as well as a few other smaller fellowships.

The challenge in the fellowship process comes in what three fellowships students should choose.  Generally, if you choose a fellowship as your first choice and somebody else puts it as her second choice, and both of you are qualified, you would get the fellowship for ranking it higher.  Thus, in addition to merit and need, strategy plays a role in successful fellowship attainment.  For example, many students may place a TA role as high on the list because these fellowships pay the same as a PA fellowship, except that they are for only a semester as opposed to the entire year for a PA.

However, there are only so many econ (for example) TAships to go around, so you should really only choose this if you did very well in econ AND you like to teach it.  More commonly, many students will choose a PA in a certain SIPA institute or for a concentration (such as UN studies or International Finance) as they view this as a way to get to know professors in those offices and a way to help with the resume.  Though such thoughts may be valid, there are only so many of these to go around, too.  I knew many students who put the EPD first-year TAship #1 on the list.  Unfortunately, 50% of SIPA students concentrate in EPD and there are only 2 such positions available.

Now, this is not to say that you should not apply for whichever fellowships that interest you the most.  However, before doing so you should carefully consider your chances.  If you have never spoken with the Human Rights Concentration head you are unlikely to get the DPA in that office, for example.  Go for Fellowships that both interest and that you have a valid chance of getting.

Overall, the Fellowship process seems to work out well in the end.  Most of my friends at SIPA got one, and all were happy in their position.  I, for one, thoroughly enjoyed my Fellowship in the Admissions office.  There were 7 of us working here, and we spent most of our time helping to process the thousands of applications that you all send in.  We also had many opportunities to talk to prospective students about our experience at SIPA, and even got to be a part of the admissions committee that reviews applications each year (this is mostly faculty and staff, but each year a few select students are asked to read some applications).

The staff here is great, and made our time working here a breeze.  I chose the admissions PA as my top choice, as I thought my previous experience working with students would help my chances.  Whether this was true or not, I did get the fellowship.  As many of you know, the admissions staff even allowed me to stay on for a couple months this summer to help out, which has been the perfect situation for me as I’ve waited for my job to start in Washington.

Many students call us to ask why they didn’t get a fellowship in their first year because school x or school y gave them one.  Our response is always that SIPA gives most of its money to second-year students.  More importantly, the amount SIPA gives in the second year is often better than what a student is offered first year somewhere else (at least it was for me).  So, it can be a bit of a gamble coming without knowing whether you will get a fellowship your second year, but it is a gamble you can win.  I was fully aware of this when I came, and made sure I did well enough my first year to be eligible.  If you focus on your studies and on getting to know people in the offices that interest you, it’s likely that something will work out for you, too.

Scholarship Program for Colombian Applicants

Applicants from Colombia who are admitted to SIPA have the opportunity to apply for funding through a special program run by the Colombian government. The objective of the COLFUTURO program is to help Colombian students study abroad with the goal of promoting the economic and social development of Colombia. For information on the program, click here.

Admitted applicants who are citizens of Colombia can fill out the paperwork to be considered. Please see their Web site for specific details.


SIPA Fellowships – A Primer

I like to be as transparent as possible concerning admissions and financial aid at SIPA – I am not a cloak and dagger type of guy.  I like two button sport coats, bright ties, and sneakers . . . but this is not about my fashion sense.

I know that paying for school is a big issue, both from a personal and professional standpoint.  As I stated in a recent entry, I attended graduate school and borrowed a substantial amount of money to do so.  Professionally, it is almost impossible to talk with a prospective student and not have the topic of the cost of education come up.

In order to provide some additional insight into the situation at SIPA I thought I would post some basic information about fellowships.  There are a lot of words in this entry and no pictures, so hang in there and read carefully and I think you will find the information valuable.

First I will note that we are not able to give out near the amount of money we would like to give to first year students.  Each year we award approximately 15% of incoming students funding and the average award is around $15,000.  Below are two examples of common emails we receive after admission decisions have been sent out:

  • I am very happy to have been admitted to SIPA, however is there any way that the admissions committee can reconsider me for fellowship funding (or increase an award I have been given)?
  • I have been admitted to SIPA and to another school and the other school is offering me funding.  Can SIPA match the funding provided by the other school?
  • Can I work as a program assistant or teaching assistant at SIPA to earn money?

The SIPA Admissions Committee actually spends twice the amount of fellowship money we have.  Why do we do this?  Because history shows that not everyone we award funding to will attend.  Thus we greatly overspend which means that if an applicant declines their award, we cannot simply shift that money to another applicant.

Regarding the second question, each school has a different committee, different applicant pool, and different budget.  In my Apples and Oranges entry a while back I talked about how comparing an offer from one school to another may seem like a logical thing to do, but the comparison is fraught with complications and variables.  And as stated above, as much as we are excited about having you come, we simply cannot base our decision on the capability of another school to provide funding.

So what about the second year?  I am happy to say that the majority of second year students at SIPA that are qualified to apply for fellowship do receive funding.  So how do you qualify?  In order to apply for second year funding at SIPA a first year student must have a 3.2 GPA at the end of the first semester.  If you meet the GPA requirement, you will submit an application to the Office of Student Affairs at SIPA in March of your first year.  Roughly 70% of those who apply are awarded funding and the average award is around $20,000.  The highest second year awards are roughly $42,000 for the year.

Second year students who are awarded fellowship funds typically have some sort of work requirement associated with the fellowship.  This can include working for a professor as a teaching assistant (TA) or in administrative department such as admissions, career services, or institutional technology as a program assistant (PA).

This relates to the third question – TA and PA positions at SIPA are reserved for second year students.  First year SIPA students are welcome to apply for positions across the university (Columbia University is made up of 17 schools) however the positions at SIPA are reserved for students in the second year of the program.

This is a good time to put in a plug for our summer math tutorial.  Since second year funding is so dependent on academic performance, it behooves you to do all that you can to make sure you do well in the first semester –  a semester in which you will be taking a heavy dose of core requirements which are quantitatively heavy.  In May admitted applicants who have chosen to enroll will be sent instructions on how to participate in an on-line summer math tutorial.

I cannot recommend highly enough that applicants who plan on enrolling participate in the summer math tutorial.  Even if you took many quantitatively oriented classes in the past, it would do you well to knock off a little bit of rust.  Again I can speak from personal experience.  I started my graduate program when I was 28 and boy was it a shock to my system when the syllabus of the first class hit my desk.

And for those who might not have completed an economics sequence, high level math class, or a statistics class, taking a summer class from a college near you is a great idea.  Courses might include microeconomics, macroeconomics, statistics, linear algebra, precalculus, or calculus.

I hope this gives you a bit of insight into the process at SIPA and please click here to explore information related to cost of attendance at SIPA.  The financial aid staff in my office will work on getting aid information out after admission decisions are published on the application site.

Coming off of the weekend I am going to spend a good portion of Monday evaluating our decision publishing schedule this week and will provide an update soon so stayed tuned.

Fellowship Opportunity for New Admits: Fall 2010-Spring 2011

Last year a newly admitted follower of this blog won the following award – I hope for repeat performance this year.  Deadline to apply is April 15, 2010.

cicrimage

The Fund for Global Environment and Conflict Resolution, The Center for International Conflict Resolution and The Italian Ministry for Environment, Land and Sea Masters Fellows: Fall 2010-Spring 2011

Overview

The fellowships for Masters students will be awarded to two, incoming and/or current students from the School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA) at Columbia University who have demonstrated excellence in the fields of conflict prevention, conflict resolution, post-conflict reconstruction, sustainable development, security and the global environment.

The Fellowship is open to incoming and current SIPA graduate students and will be for two full semesters; the fellowship is designed to foster new scholarly experts in the following countries or regions: Italy, the Balkans, Iraq, Afghanistan, Peru, Colombia, China, the Middle East, and/or North Africa; therefore, preference will be given to applicants from the foregoing countries or regions.

All applicants should submit their candidature by 15 April 2010. The decision will be undertaken by a selection committee at CICR, and will be announced in July. All decisions are final, and applications received after the 15 April 2010 will not be accepted.

The research work of the selected fellows will involve 10-15 hours of work per week at CICR. The research will revolve around lessons learned and best practices regarding environmental concerns and the role of climate change in three specific fields with various geographical areas of focus:

  • Conflict prevention and control in areas where current tensions indicate the potential for conflict, specifically China, the Middle East, and North Africa
  • Conflict resolution with respect to conflict and post-conflict areas, specifically the Balkans, Iraq, Afghanistan, Peru and Colombia.
  • International security in general in the Balkans, Iraq, Afghanistan, Peru, Colombia, China, the Middle East, and/or North Africa.

The Fellows will be awarded $9,000 towards their university fees each semester and a stipend of $500 per month over the course of the academic year (nine months), and will be known as an “Empedocle Maffia Fellows”.

Application Process

A successful application will include:

I. A completed application form (to be provided).

II. 500-800 word essay detailing candidate’s motivation for applying to the Global Fund for Environment and Conflict Resolution at CICR.

III. Current CV/Resume and copy of passport and visa where appropriate.

IV. Minimum one, maximum three recommendation letter(s).

The applications should be sent when fully completed to CICR’s Assistant Director, Josie Lianna Kaye at [email protected] with the title GECR: Masters Candidate.

Masters Fellows 2010 Application Link

Idioms and Admissions: Apples and Oranges

The earliest memory I can seem to muster of the idiom, “That is like comparing apples to oranges” is from high school. I can not remember if it was my Personal Finance teacher or my Cross Country coach, but it was one of the two (and comparing those two certainly is like comparing apples to oranges). I remember being stumped by the idiom at first. I did not understand the context and asked around until some other examples finally brought the point home to me.

While Wikipedia delves into the validity of the usefulness of the idiom, to me the admission decision season provides a scenario where the idiom makes perfect sense.  No decisions have not started to post to the application site yet, but I wanted to get a jump on some of the questions that might arise after we do start posting.

Most applicants apply to several different schools and it is only natural not only to compare the characteristics of those schools, but the admission decisions of those schools.

Getting down to brass tacks, (sorry, guess I am in an idiom mood) what is the point of this entry? When decisions go out each year applicants will often contact our office to discuss their SIPA admission decision. Statements and questions like the following are not uncommon this time of year:

  • I don’t understand why I was put on the waitlist at SIPA when I was admitted to all of the other schools I applied to. Can you explain why?
  • I received a fellowship offer from another school but not from SIPA. Why didn’t I get SIPA fellowship funding?
  • SIPA’s letter said that I should get more experience and apply again at a later time but other schools admitted me? Why?
  • My decision letter from SIPA said I could benefit from more quantitative preparation but I was admitted to other similar schools. Why is this the case?
  • My decision letter from SIPA said I could benefit from additional English language study but I was admitted to other U.S. programs. Why?
  • Why have I heard from other schools but not SIPA?

From an administrators point of view statements and questions like these are, well, like comparing apples to oranges.

If it were an apples to apples comparison, every single applicant would have had to apply to the same schools, have been read by the exact same committee, and the committees would need to share one big budget. Obviously this is not what happens.

Sure policy schools are similar in many ways. We have similar core classes, faculty that study, teach, and practice common subjects, and we seek to prepare students for similar careers. However each school is quite different in many ways when it comes to shaping an incoming class.

Each school has its own unique Admissions Committee structure. Each school has its own unique applicant pool. Each school has a different fellowship endowment and can choose to use it in different ways. Each school has different donors who set different criteria for awards. Each school has its own time lines.

I am not going to pretend that by reading this entry all of your questions or concerns about admission decisions may be put at ease, but I hope it does provide insight into “the big picture.” Each policy school is different in its own way and will make decisions based on its history, goals, preferences and yes, limitations.

Thus, comparing a decision from one school to another is often like comparing apples to oranges. Okay, now it is time for me to return to burning the candle at both ends . . .

"The most global public policy school, where an international community of students and faculty address world challenges."

—Merit E. Janow, Dean, SIPA, Professor of Practice, International and Economic Law and International Affairs

Boiler Image