Archive for deadline – Page 11

2010 Application Information Post #3: Transcript Submission Changes

One of the challenges faced each year by the Office of Admissions is processing thousands of application documents submitted by mail.  As you might imagine, opening, categorizing, alphabetizing, tracking, and filing documents is quite time intensive. We are constantly seeking new ways to expedite the admission review process and starting with the 2010 admission cycle we will allow applicants to upload copies of academic transcripts to the application Web site.

In the past we required applicants to submit an official copy of all academic transcripts by mail in order to review an application for admission.  By allowing applicants to upload copies of transcripts to the application site we hope to expedite the process and reduce the burden placed upon applicants to work with their previous institutions to ensure that transcripts are mailed to our office by the admission deadline.

Going forward, the preferred method to submit college/university transcripts for admission consideration will be by upload to our application Web site by the deadline.  If an applicant is offered admission official transcripts will then need to be submitted to confirm enrollment.  Specific dates by which official transcripts will need to be submitted will be communicated after admission offers are made.

We thus recommend that all applicants request copies of all academic transcripts pertaining to college/university level coursework.  If you receive these copies by mail, you will be responsible for scanning and uploading the transcripts to the application Web site.  If your school sends electronic copies you may upload these documents to our application Web site.

There are two very important points to consider.

First, it is extremely important that all transcript information is scanned.  Universities use different coding systems to report grades and most often these codes are listed on the back side of printed transcripts.  The Committee will need this information and if the codes are not part of the upload, the application will not be considered complete.

Second, applicants must submit copies of transcripts from all colleges/universities attended.  For example, if you attended one school for two years and then transferred to another school to complete your degree, we would need separate transcripts from each school – not one single transcript with grades from both schools.  Exceptions are granted for exchange programs.  We understand that exchange programs often utilize the home school’s grading system and thus a second transcript might not be necessary.  If you have doubts we recommend submitting all transcripts.  You can contact our office if you have questions or concerns.

Copies of high school transcripts are not necessary.  Applicants should include transcripts from all college/university coursework completed, even if a degree was not granted.  For example, if you graduated and then later took college level courses that were not part of a degree program, we still will require a transcript documenting the course(s) taken and grade(s) achieved.

2010 Application Information Post #1: Changes in the Process for 2010

Admission work pretty much follows an annual cycle and if you have been following the blog you know that much of the focus has been on wrapping up the current cycle of those who will be joining us this fall.  The bulk of admission travel and outreach happens during the fall months, however I have noticed that email traffic is picking up regarding the new application year that is ahead of us.

I wanted to post an entry to assure those interested in applying for spring 2010 or fall 2010 that we will have plenty of content coming your way soon.  And for you incoming students, we still have information for you so stay tuned as well.  Thanks to all the new students that have been sending in photos!  If you have sent photos, rest assured I will get them up eventually, and if you have not sent photos yet, please do.

For you future applicants, the Admissions Committee has been meeting over the past month to discuss how we can make the application process better for both those who apply and those who read the applications.  We have made some decisions and my staff and I are working with our technical crew as well as Senior members of the Committee to put everything in order for the coming year.

The Committee had two main goals in mind this year.  First, we hope to make the process of submitting documents easier.  Second, we hope that some slight changes to what we ask for in the application will help the Committee to better evaluate candidates for admission as well as give candidates a better opportunity to explain their qualifications for our programs.

I do not want to sound too cryptic or give too much away at this point.  The real gist of this entry is to assure you that the decisions we are making are in the best interests of all involved.  I can tell you that our goal is to have the new application “go live” on August 15th.  If you have started an application you will notice at this point there is no option to choose “Spring 2010” or “Fall 2010” as your application semester.  When the new application goes live these choices will be enabled, along with some modified instructions.

Please do not fret, we will not be asking anything radically different, we will just be asking applicants to submit similar information in different formats.  One thing that will stay the same is our deadlines.  The spring deadline will be October 1st and the fall deadline will be January 5th.  So stay tuned and in the coming weeks I will be rolling out the changes we will be making in the applcation process for the coming year.

80% +

Just a quick update on decisions . . .

We have published just over 80% of our decisions to date.  Please note that when an admission file is read has no bearing upon the final decision.  We are looking for qualified candidates and the qualities we look for and the evaluation system we use does not change over time.

I will say that some files do take longer to review than others.  This can be for a variety of reasons including flagging a candidate for fellowship (which results in an additional meeting) or asking for further review by a Senior Member of the Admissions Committee.

As stated in a previous entry, we cannot provide estimates on when individual decisions will be published but rest assured that we are working as quickly as possibly.  I know that many applicants who have not heard are anxious, but I think you would agree that having the Committee spend quality time reviewing your application is preferable to rushing through the process.

Hang in there if you have yet to hear, an email will be coming your way soon.

Waiting is the Hardest Part

I do not think that Tom Petty has a graduate degree, however the chorus to his song “The Waiting” is appropriate this time of year.  The chorus leads off with “The waiting is the hardest part.”  I know that waiting to hear of an admission decision can be hard.  We receive lots of phone calls and emails each day with people eager for more information.

Hundreds of files are still in process and we are working as quickly as we are able.  About half of our decisions have been sent which means we still have a way to go.  As referenced in an entry last week, when a decision has been rendered an email will be sent to the email account you listed when you applied on the online site.  We appeciate your inquires, however we cannot give exact information on when a decision will be rendered.

Hang in there if you have yet hear.

Idioms and Admission Decisions: Apples and Oranges

The earliest memory I can seem to muster of the idiom, “That is like comparing apples to oranges” is from high school.  I can not remember if it was my Personal Finance teacher or my Cross Country coach, but it was one of the two (and comparing those two certainly is like comparing apples to oranges).  I remember being stumped by the idiom at first.  I did not understand the context and asked around until some other examples finally brought the point home to me.

While Wikipedia delves into the validity of the usefulness of the idiom, to me the admission decision season provides a scenario where the idiom makes perfect sense.  Most applicants apply to several different schools and it is only natural not only to compare the characteristics of those schools, but the admission decisions of those schools.

I know discussion about this goes on, quite passionate discussion in fact, because occasionally I will visit discussion boards pertaining to graduate schools and graduate school admission.  I visited a few yesterday and the discussion is quite . . . lively.

I do not comment on the boards, the boards are for applicants and students, not administrators.  The discussion on the boards provides a unique perspective on the graduate school admission process for sure – especially from the standpoint of an administrator.  I often try to learn from the discussion and comments to develop more clear communication strategies.

Getting down to brass tacks, (sorry, guess I am in an idiom mood) what is the point of this entry?  When decisions go out each year applicants will often contact our office to discuss their SIPA admission decision.  Statements and questions like the following are not uncommon this time of year:

I don’t understand why I was put on the waitlist at SIPA when I was admitted to all of the other schools I applied to. Can you explain why?

I received a fellowship offer from another school but not from SIPA.  Why didn’t I get SIPA fellowship funding?

SIPA’s letter said that I should get more experience and apply again at a later time but other schools admitted me?  Why?

My decision letter from SIPA said I could benefit from more quantitative preparation but I was admitted to other similar schools.  Why is this the case?

My decision letter from SIPA said I could benefit from additional English language study but I was admitted to other U.S. programs.  Why?

Why have I heard from other schools but not SIPA?

From an administrators point of view statements and questions like these are, well, like comparing apples to oranges.

If it were an apples to apples comparison, every single applicant would have had to apply to the same schools, have been read by the exact same committee, and the committees would need to share one big budget.  Obviously this is not what happens.

Sure policy schools are similar in many ways.  We have similar core classes, faculty that study, teach, and practice common subjects, and we seek to prepare students for similar careers.  However each school is quite different in many ways when it comes to shaping an incoming class.

Each school has its own unique Admissions Committee structure.  Each school has its own unique applicant pool.  Each school has a different fellowship endowment and can choose to use it in different ways.  Each school has different donors who set different criteria for awards.  Each school has its own time lines.

I am not going to pretend that by reading this entry all of your questions or concerns about admission decisions may be put at ease, but I hope it does provide insight into “the big picture.”  Each policy school is different in its own way and will make decisions based on its history, goals, preferences and yes, limitations.

Thus, comparing a decision from one school to another is often like comparing apples to oranges.  Okay, now it is time for me to return to burning the candle at both ends . . .

"The most global public policy school, where an international community of students and faculty address world challenges."

—Merit E. Janow, Dean, SIPA, Professor of Practice, International and Economic Law and International Affairs

Boiler Image