Archive for Application – Page 32

Application is Down – To "Go Live" on August 15th

I wanted to let everyone know that each summer we take our application off line for a period of time to perform maintenance and implement changes to improve the process.  Yesterday we posted a message on the application site stating that the application is currently unavailable.  Our goal is to have the application up and ready to go for the coming year on August 15th.

Just because the application is down for maintainence does not mean that you cannot read about the requirements.  I recently completed an update to our application information page.  Please click here to read about the application requirements, deadlines, and program information.  Please stay tuned to the blog as well because I will continue to post detailed information related to the application requirements and changes that we are making to the process this year.

2010 Application Information Post #3: Transcript Submission Changes

One of the challenges faced each year by the Office of Admissions is processing thousands of application documents submitted by mail.  As you might imagine, opening, categorizing, alphabetizing, tracking, and filing documents is quite time intensive. We are constantly seeking new ways to expedite the admission review process and starting with the 2010 admission cycle we will allow applicants to upload copies of academic transcripts to the application Web site.

In the past we required applicants to submit an official copy of all academic transcripts by mail in order to review an application for admission.  By allowing applicants to upload copies of transcripts to the application site we hope to expedite the process and reduce the burden placed upon applicants to work with their previous institutions to ensure that transcripts are mailed to our office by the admission deadline.

Going forward, the preferred method to submit college/university transcripts for admission consideration will be by upload to our application Web site by the deadline.  If an applicant is offered admission official transcripts will then need to be submitted to confirm enrollment.  Specific dates by which official transcripts will need to be submitted will be communicated after admission offers are made.

We thus recommend that all applicants request copies of all academic transcripts pertaining to college/university level coursework.  If you receive these copies by mail, you will be responsible for scanning and uploading the transcripts to the application Web site.  If your school sends electronic copies you may upload these documents to our application Web site.

There are two very important points to consider.

First, it is extremely important that all transcript information is scanned.  Universities use different coding systems to report grades and most often these codes are listed on the back side of printed transcripts.  The Committee will need this information and if the codes are not part of the upload, the application will not be considered complete.

Second, applicants must submit copies of transcripts from all colleges/universities attended.  For example, if you attended one school for two years and then transferred to another school to complete your degree, we would need separate transcripts from each school – not one single transcript with grades from both schools.  Exceptions are granted for exchange programs.  We understand that exchange programs often utilize the home school’s grading system and thus a second transcript might not be necessary.  If you have doubts we recommend submitting all transcripts.  You can contact our office if you have questions or concerns.

Copies of high school transcripts are not necessary.  Applicants should include transcripts from all college/university coursework completed, even if a degree was not granted.  For example, if you graduated and then later took college level courses that were not part of a degree program, we still will require a transcript documenting the course(s) taken and grade(s) achieved.

2010 Application Information Post #2: Résumé/CV Changes

In a recent post I mentioned that the Admissions Committee has decided to make some changes to the application process in the coming year.  As the title of this post suggests, I will be laying out the changes in a series of entries in the coming weeks.

One of the changes may at first seem a bit burdensome, but I assure you it is in the best interests of both applicants and Committee members who review applications.  In the past we have asked for the submission of one résumé.  Starting with the spring 2010 cycle we will be asking for two résumés (note that we consider CV and résumé to be interchangeable terms).

Traditional Résumé

The first résumé will be the “traditional” résumé we have always asked for as a part of the application process.  A traditional résumé includes, but is not limited to, information such as:

  • Positions held (employment and internships)
  • Academic degrees and other academic achievements
  • Volunteer, public service, political work completed
  • Memberships in honorary societies and awards for service or leadership
  • Extracurricular activities and particularly if an MIA applicant – foreign travel undertaken, including purpose and length of stay.

As has always been the case, with this traditional résumé we do not recommend trying to keep it to a single page in length.  A one page résumé is more aligned with applying for a job.  This résumé is for graduate school consideration and the Committee encourages applicants to list all relevant information and to not use a small font or extended margins in an attempt to cram a great deal of information into a very small space.  A typical résumé in this format submitted to SIPA is three to four pages in length.

Quantitative/Language Résumé

The second résumé will focus exclusively on an applicant’s background with quantitative methods and language learning/ability.

Quantitative Methods

The core curriculum at SIPA includes required coursework in economics, statistics, and financial management.  The Committee is therefore quite interested in the quantitative aptitude of applicants to our program.  This most typically includes coursework and/or professional experience related to mathematics, statistics, and economics.  Also of note  can be quantitative experience as it pertains to areas such as science or engineering.

Unfortunately, academic transcripts rarely provide in depth descriptions of the actual content of coursework completed.  For example, a class labeled as “Principles of Economics” on a transcript provides little detail on how much focus was placed on the use of quantitative methods.  And with the large number of international applicants to SIPA, often times transcripts translated into English will just list a class as “Mathematics” thus giving the Committee little information on the actual content/level of math studied.

Providing the opportunity for applicants to list detailed information pertaining to quantitative preparation/experience will allow for better explanations of past academic and professional experience.  The goal is to be able to allow applicants to list full descriptions of courses included in a course catalog or in the syllabus used in a class.

Language Learning/Ability

Proficiency in a second language is a graduation requirement of the MIA program but is not a requirement of the MPA program.  Proficiency is defined as the ability to use a second language at an intermediate level.  Academically this is defined as the ability to achieve a grade of “B” or better in an intermediate level 2 language course.

Incoming  MIA students who speak English as a native language will be tested in a second language of their choice upon entering into the program.  Due to the intensity of the MIA program at SIPA, it would be quite difficult for an applicant with no previous language study to achieve intermediate level proficiency in two years of study.  The Committee therefore wishes to see at least elementary level proficiency in a second language when evaluating an MIA applicant for admission.

If an incoming native English speaker passes the proficiency exam administered shortly after beginning the program, no additional language study is required.  If the grade achieved on the exam is not sufficient, to prove proficiency a grade of “B” or better must be achieved in an intermediate level 2 language course during the time at SIPA in order to graduate.

For MPA students that speak English as a native language, second language learning is optional so it is not required to include language learning information in the second résumé.  However, if an MPA applicant does have experience in a second language we encourage them to provide this information because it provides us with additional information on your background. 

Please do note that there is one exception to the language requirement for the MPA program.  If an MPA applicant chooses the Economic and Political Development concentration, second language proficiency is a requirement just like in the MIA program.

For applicants that do not speak English as a native language, the second résumé will provide an opportunity to elaborate further on time spent studying English and other languages.  This can of course include academic study but can also include additional information not included in transcripts or test scores such as time spent living in English speaking environments.

Details on Quantitative/Language Learning

The second résumé is meant to provide applicants with the ability to provide detailed information which can include:

  • Name/level/grade/institution pertaining to classroom courses.
  • For classroom courses, a description of the course and specific learning objectives (best done by providing a description from a course catalog or a syllabus that was used for the class).
  • Examples of working knowledge of the subject matter as demonstrated in academic or professional settings.
  • Tests taken and grades/scores achieved.
  • Specific certificates earned.
  • In the case of second language learning, the following information is useful:
  1. Information on time spent in a foreign country where the language is spoken.  Or, if the second language was spoken in your home country please provide the context (i.e. did you grow up in a home where a second language was spoken but your academic training was in another language?).
  2. Details regarding professional/volunteer/personal use of the language.
  3. Specific details/examples regarding writing, reading, speaking, and listening ability.

One question you might have is, “If the course is listed on my transcripts or noted in another part of my application, is it necessary to include it in the Quantitative/Language  résumé?”

The answer is yes.  It is okay to be redundant or to include the same information that might be listed in another part of the application in this section.  Seeing the information twice, but in more detailed format in the  résumé portion, is what the Committee is seeking to achieve.

You can view samples of this résumé by clicking here.  Do note that the sample is only a guide.  The level of detail you wish to include is entirely up to you.

2010 Application Information Post #1: Changes in the Process for 2010

Admission work pretty much follows an annual cycle and if you have been following the blog you know that much of the focus has been on wrapping up the current cycle of those who will be joining us this fall.  The bulk of admission travel and outreach happens during the fall months, however I have noticed that email traffic is picking up regarding the new application year that is ahead of us.

I wanted to post an entry to assure those interested in applying for spring 2010 or fall 2010 that we will have plenty of content coming your way soon.  And for you incoming students, we still have information for you so stay tuned as well.  Thanks to all the new students that have been sending in photos!  If you have sent photos, rest assured I will get them up eventually, and if you have not sent photos yet, please do.

For you future applicants, the Admissions Committee has been meeting over the past month to discuss how we can make the application process better for both those who apply and those who read the applications.  We have made some decisions and my staff and I are working with our technical crew as well as Senior members of the Committee to put everything in order for the coming year.

The Committee had two main goals in mind this year.  First, we hope to make the process of submitting documents easier.  Second, we hope that some slight changes to what we ask for in the application will help the Committee to better evaluate candidates for admission as well as give candidates a better opportunity to explain their qualifications for our programs.

I do not want to sound too cryptic or give too much away at this point.  The real gist of this entry is to assure you that the decisions we are making are in the best interests of all involved.  I can tell you that our goal is to have the new application “go live” on August 15th.  If you have started an application you will notice at this point there is no option to choose “Spring 2010” or “Fall 2010” as your application semester.  When the new application goes live these choices will be enabled, along with some modified instructions.

Please do not fret, we will not be asking anything radically different, we will just be asking applicants to submit similar information in different formats.  One thing that will stay the same is our deadlines.  The spring deadline will be October 1st and the fall deadline will be January 5th.  So stay tuned and in the coming weeks I will be rolling out the changes we will be making in the applcation process for the coming year.

80% +

Just a quick update on decisions . . .

We have published just over 80% of our decisions to date.  Please note that when an admission file is read has no bearing upon the final decision.  We are looking for qualified candidates and the qualities we look for and the evaluation system we use does not change over time.

I will say that some files do take longer to review than others.  This can be for a variety of reasons including flagging a candidate for fellowship (which results in an additional meeting) or asking for further review by a Senior Member of the Admissions Committee.

As stated in a previous entry, we cannot provide estimates on when individual decisions will be published but rest assured that we are working as quickly as possibly.  I know that many applicants who have not heard are anxious, but I think you would agree that having the Committee spend quality time reviewing your application is preferable to rushing through the process.

Hang in there if you have yet to hear, an email will be coming your way soon.

"The most global public policy school, where an international community of students and faculty address world challenges."

—Merit E. Janow, Dean, SIPA, Professor of Practice, International and Economic Law and International Affairs

Boiler Image