One of the most frequent critiques leveled at President Obama is that he has diminished the United States’ international “credibility.” For example, former Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel has argued that Obama’s decision not to bomb Syria after the use of chemical weapons there in 2013 damaged U.S. credibility. These critics argue that the United States must follow through on its commitments today so that its threats will be credible (and thus effective) tomorrow.
I have a new article published today at War on the Rocks explaining why these arguments about America’s credibility and reputation are misguided. You can read the article here.